/

Emergency fund: Unexpected expenses are always lurking

Dear Dave, 
When I leave my job in two or three years, I’ll still have a good income of around $80,000 thanks to my pension. I talked with my wife recently about us not needing an emergency fund with a continuing steady income like this, but she thinks we should still have money set aside strictly for emergencies. I think we would be fine with my pension and our other investments, but she says a fund set aside strictly for the unexpected would make her feel safer. What are your thoughts? 

Barrett 

Dear Barrett, 
I always recommend folks have an emergency fund of three to six months of expenses. Put it in a good money market account with check-writing privileges and a decent interest rate. That way, your money will work for you a little bit until it’s needed.

I know a good pension can feel really solid. But there’s always the possibility of lost income or very large, unexpected expenses. Life can take a big financial chunk out of you at any time. What if one, or both of you, have a major medical event? Even with the other investments you mentioned, you should have an emergency fund. Period. 

In your case, you could probably lean toward three months of expenses in your emergency fund. If it were me, I’d go ahead and make it a full six months of expenses. Trust me, a fully funded emergency fund will make both of you feel better. It can turn a disaster into nothing more than an inconvenience.
— Dave

Dave Ramsey is a national bestselling author, personal finance expert and host of The Ramsey Show.

Dave Ramsey

Dave Ramsey is a best-selling author, personal finance expert and host of The Ramsey Show.

Latest from Columns